- Judge Will Hear Birth Certificate Case Next Month
- Trump signs pledge to back GOP's 2016 presidential nominee
- Austin Limo & Taxi Drivers Don't Want To 'Pay The Price' Anymore
- Austin TNC Drivers Push City To Dump Proposed Regulations
- Perry campaign will have 1 paid staffer in Iowa
- Hundreds Of New Laws Take Effect In Texas
- Racing Commission Suspends Operations Amid Funding Squabble
- Latest Texas School Finance Case Reaches State Supreme Court
- Kentucky clerk still won't issue same-sex marriage licenses
- Perry Campaign Will Have 1 Paid Staffer In Iowa
- 2011 Budget Cuts Still Hamper Schools, Data Shows
- Abbott Wants New Abortion Limits Following Undercover Video
- August is buy month for federal regulators
- Sex slavery in ISIS
- Trump, Cruz To Hold Joint Event To Blast Iran Deal
- Texas Attorney General Paxton Pleads Not Guilty To Fraud
- Perry On Campaign Struggles: I'm Not Giving Up
- How low will gas prices go?
- Perry, Santorum Presidential Hopes Undercut By Own Donors
- Are GOP candidates trying to out-Trump Trump?
- Former intern for Texas legislature charged with manufacture or possession with intent ot deliver controlled substances
- Austin Sues Texas Over Property Tax Appraisal System
- Battle Over School Funding In Texas Set To Continue
- Abbott: Indicted AG Paxton Innocent Until Proven Guilty
- WATCH LIVE: Donald Trump rally in Alabama
- LIVE STREAM: Join us for a Town Hall discussion on campus carry
- Comparing Bill and Hillary Clinton's scandals
- Taking New Steps To Put An End To 'Revenge Porn'
- Police: Man who beat homeless Mexican said 'Trump was right'
- City Council Votes In Favor Of Conditional Use Permit For East Austin Farm
- Cheating website subscribers included White House, Congress workers
- ISIS territory: one year later
- Luckless At Capitol, Minimum Wage Advocates Go Local
- Ethics fray puts Texas AG Paxton's office against big donor
- Deez Nuts For President? Independent Candidate Has Strong Showing In Polls
- Asked If She Wiped Email Server, Clinton Says, 'What, Like With A Cloth?'
- New Travis Co. Courthouse To Appear On Nov. Ballot
- Texas AG Paxton Re-indicted
- 305 more Hillary Clinton e-mails deemed 'questionable'
- George Zimmerman Confederate flag painting the prize in 'Muslim-free' gun store contest
- Interim Committee To Take A Closer Look At Jail Safety
- Top Texas Official Won't Apologize For Muslim-Bombing Post
- Reluctant Kentucky clerk gets time for gay marriage appeal
- Austin Panel Set To Consider Water Fluoridation Proposal
- Connect To Congress: Rep. Roger Williams
- Trump still tops polls as first policy plan is released
- Parents To Be Guaranteed Right To Bury Stillborn Babies
- Iran's Ayatollah releases anti-American, anti-Israel book
- HELP WANTED: Inspectors General needed
- Texas police officers' 'All Lives Matter' Facebook post goes viral
Texas House Panel Debates Fetal Pain Bill
Updated: Thursday, April 11 2013, 09:53 AM CDT
by Becca Aaronson, Texas Tribune
The House State Affairs Committee on Wednesday took testimony on the controversial so-called fetal pain bill, a measure backed by Gov. Rick Perry and abortion opponents who argue that 20 weeks is the point at which fetuses can feel pain.
House Bill 2364, by state Reps. Jodie Laubenberg, R-Parker, and Jeff Leach, R-Plano, would prohibit abortions after that point. The bill would shorten the timeframe in which a woman could legally obtain an abortion in Texas by seven weeks, as current law already prohibits abortions during the third trimester unless the health or life of the mother is at stake or there are fetal abnormalities.
After introducing the bill, Laubenberg went head to head with state Rep. Jessica Farrar, D-Houston, who opposes the bill, on whether there is sufficient scientific evidence to support the assertion that fetuses can feel pain at 20 weeks of development.
"I will very gladly place my studies against your studies," said Laubenberg. She later added, "We’re talking about science and technology, which you folks are all for, telling us things that we didn’t know before that we know now."
While peer-reviewed studies show that fetuses have developed incomplete nervous systems at 20 weeks and therefore react to stimulus, there is not consensus on whether this reflex indicates that fetuses feel pain.
Farrar pointed to a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association published in 2005 which found that "evidence regarding the capacity for fetal pain is limited but indicates that fetal perception of pain is unlikely before the third trimester."
"This is the largest medical association, this isn’t a fringe group. … This is the mainstream medical information," said Farrar. She also cited reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that 1.3 percent of abortions are performed after 21 weeks.
"We’re putting her health at risk because somehow we think this is going to stop women from having abortions," she said.
Dr. Ingrid Scobb, an obstetrician and gynecologist in San Antonio, testified in favor of the bill, saying that she has "seen fetuses withdraw their limbs when they encounter the amniotic needle."
"Admittedly we do not know how a fetus feels about this pain," she said, "but we also do not know how a tortured kitten feels and yet we have laws against that abuse."
The bill contains an exception to allow an abortion if the mother’s life is in danger or if a physician believes the pregnancy poses "serious risk of substantial or irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function, other than a psychological condition."
If the bill passes, Texas would become the 10th state to ban abortions after 20 weeks. Other states that approved "fetal pain" laws have faced legal challenges.
Heather Busby, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Texas, said the bill is unconstitutional because it bans abortions before fetal viability.
"This bill has a serious lack of exceptions that leave women in the most dire situations with no alternative," added Busby, emphasizing that the bill does not include an exception for victims of rape or incest or instances of fetal abnormalities. "No lawmaker can possibly know the circumstances of every woman, and therefore no lawmaker should interfere in those decisions."
This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at http://www.texastribune.org/2013/04/10/house-panel-debates-so-called-fetal-pain-bill/.